Communities with fewer than six evacuation routes face heightened risks during wildfires, as limited exits can lead to congestion, road blockages, and delayed evacuations. Vulnerable populations, including the elderly and children, are particularly at risk in such scenarios. The research highlights that adding more than six routes does not significantly reduce risk, but reaching this threshold is crucial for resilience. Areas like Paradise, California, serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of insufficient evacuation infrastructure, where road closures and burnovers during the Camp Fire exacerbated the disaster. This study provides a clear policy guideline for urban planners and emergency management officials to prioritize evacuation route development in high-risk areas.